Paper detail

Uncertainties in polarimetric 3D reconstructions of coronal mass ejections

This work is aimed at quantifying the uncertainties in the 3D reconstruction of the location of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) obtained with the polarization ratio technique. The method takes advantage of the different distributions along the line of sight (LOS) of total (tB) and polarized (pB) brightnesses to estimate the average location of the emitting plasma. To this end, we assumed two simple electron density distributions along the LOS (a constant density and Gaussian density profiles) for a plasma blob and synthesized the expected tB and pB for different distances $z$ of the blob from the plane of the sky (POS) and different projected altitudes $ρ$. Reconstructed locations of the blob along the LOS were thus compared with the real ones, allowing a precise determination of uncertainties in the method. Independently of the analytical density profile, when the blob is centered at a small distance from the POS (i.e. for limb CMEs) the distance from the POS starts to be significantly overestimated. Polarization ratio technique provides the LOS position of the center of mass of what we call folded density distribution, given by reflecting and summing in front of the POS the fraction of density profile located behind that plane. On the other hand, when the blob is far from the POS, but with very small projected altitudes (i.e. for halo CMEs, $ρ< 1.4$ R$_\odot$), the inferred distance from that plane is significantly underestimated. Better determination of the real blob position along the LOS is given for intermediate locations, and in particular when the blob is centered at an angle of $20^\circ$ from the POS. These result have important consequences not only for future 3D reconstruction of CMEs with polarization ratio technique, but also for the design of future coronagraphs aimed at providing a continuous monitoring of halo-CMEs for space weather prediction purposes.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.