BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Alessandro Bemporad

Alessandro Bemporad contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Is there a Dynamic Difference between Stealthy and Standard CMEs?

Stealthy Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs), lacking low coronal signatures, may result in significant geomagnetic storms. However, the mechanism of stealthy CMEs is still highly debated. In this work, we investigate whether there are differences between the stealthy and standard CMEs in terms of their dynamic behaviors. Seven stealthy and eight standard CMEs with slow speeds are selected. We calculate two-dimensional speed distributions of CMEs based on the cross-correlation method, rather than the unidimensional speed, and further obtain more accurate distributions and evolution of CME mechanical energies. Then we derive the CME driving powers and correlate them with CME parameters (total mass, average speed, and acceleration) for standard and stealthy CMEs. Besides, we study the forces that drive CMEs, namely, the Lorentz force, gravitational force, and drag force due to the ambient solar wind near the Sun. The results reveal that both the standard and stealthy CMEs are propelled by the combined action of those forces in the inner corona. The drag force and gravitational force are comparable with the Lorentz force. However, the impact of the drag and Lorentz forces on the global evolution of the stealthy CMEs is significantly weaker than that of the standard CMEs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Polarimetric Studies of a Fast Coronal Mass Ejection

In this work we performed a polarimetric study of a fast and wide coronal mass ejection (CME) observed on 12 July 2012 by the COR1 and COR2 instruments onboard Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory (STEREO) mission. The CME source region was an X1.4 flare located at approximately S15W01 on the solar disk as observed from the Earth's perspective. The position of the CME as derived from the 3D Graduated Cylindrical Shell (GCS) reconstruction method was at around S18W00 at 2.5 solar radii and S07W00 at 5.7 solar radii, meaning that the CME was deflected towards the Equator while propagating outward in the corona. The projected speed of the leading edge of the CME also evolved from around 200 km s$^{-1}$ in the lower corona to around 1000 km s$^{-1}$ in the COR2 field of view. The degree of polarisation of the CME is around 65 % but it can go as high as 80 % in some CME regions. The CME showed deviation of the polarisation angle from the tangential in the range of 10$^\circ$ - 15$^\circ$ (or more). Our analysis showed that this is mostly due to the fact that the sequence of three polarised images from where the polarised parameters are derived is not taken simultaneously, but at a difference of few seconds in time. In this interval of time, the CME is moving by at least two pixels in the FOV of the instruments and this displacement results in uncertainties in the polarisation parameters (degree of polarisation, polarisation angle, etc.). We propose some steps forward to improve the derivation of the polarisation. This study is important for analysing the future data from instruments with polarisation capabilities.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Extensive Study of a Coronal Mass Ejection with UV and WL coronagraphs: the need for multi-wavelength observations

Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) often show different features in different band-passes. By combining data in white-light (WL) and ultraviolet (UV) bands, we have applied different techniques to derive plasma temperatures, electron density, internal radial speed, etc, within a fast CME. They serve as extensive tests of the diagnostic capabilities, developed for the observations provided by future multi-channel coronagraphs (such as Solar Orbiter/Metis, ASO-S/LST, PROBA-3/ASPIICS). The involved data include WL images acquired by SOHO/LASCO coronagraphs, and intensities measured by SOHO/UVCS at 2.45 R$_{\odot}$ in the UV (H I Ly$α$ and O VI 1032 {AA} lines) and WL channels. Data from the UVCS WL channel have been employed for the first time to measure the CME position angle with polarization-ratio technique. Plasma electron and effective temperatures of the CME core and void are estimated by combining UV and WL data. Due to the CME expansion and the possible existence of prominence segments, the transit of the CME core results in decreases of the electron temperature down to $10^{5}$ K. The front is observed as a significant dimming in the Ly$α$ intensity, associated with a line broadening due to plasma heating and flows along the line-of-sight. The 2D distribution of plasma speeds within the CME body is reconstructed from LASCO images and employed to constrain the Doppler dimming of Ly$α$ line, and simulate future CME observations by Metis and LST.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On the Possibilities of Detecting Helium D$_3$ Line Polarization with Metis

Space coronagraph Metis on board of the Solar Orbiter offers us new capabilities for studying eruptive prominences and coronal mass ejections (CME). Its two spectral channels, hydrogen L$α$ and visible-light (VL) will provide, for the first time, co-aligned and co-temporal images to study dynamics and plasma properties of CMEs. Moreover, with the VL channel (580 - 640 nm) we find an exciting possibility to detect the helium D$_3$ line (587.73 nm) and its linear polarization. The aim of this study is to predict the diagnostics potential of this line regarding the CME thermal and magnetic structure. For a grid of models we first compute the intensity of the D$_3$ line together with VL continuum intensity due to Thomson scattering on core electrons. We show that the Metis VL channel will detect a mixture of both, with predominance of the helium emission at intermediate temperatures between 30 - 50,000 K. Then we use the code HAZEL to compute the degree of linear polarization detectable in the VL channel. This is a mixture of D$_3$ scattering polarization and continuum polarization. The former one is lowered in the presence of a magnetic field and the polarization axis is rotated (Hanle effect). Metis has the capability of measuring $Q/I$ and $U/I$ polarization degrees and we show their dependence on temperature and magnetic field. At $T$=30,000 K we find a significant lowering of $Q/I$ which is due to strongly enhanced D$_3$ line emission, while depolarization at 10 G amounts roughly to 10 \%.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access