Paper detail

Unblocking of stellar electron capture for neutron-rich $N=50$ nuclei at finite temperature

We have calculated electron capture rates for neutron-rich $N=50$ nuclei ($^{78}$Ni, $^{82}$Ge, $^{86}$Kr, $^{88}$Sr) within the Thermal QRPA approach at temperatures $T=0$, corresponding to capture on the ground-state, and at $T=10$ GK (0.86 MeV), which is a typical temperature at which the $N=50$ nuclei are abundant during a supernova collapse. In agreement with recent experiments, we find no Gamow-Teller (GT$_+$) strength at low excitation energies, $E<7$ MeV, caused by Pauli blocking induced by the $N=50$ shell gap. At the astrophysically relevant temperatures this Pauli blocking of the GT$_+$ strength is overcome by thermal excitations across the $Z=40$ proton and $N=50$ neutron shell gaps, leading to a sizable GT contribution to the electron capture. At the high densities, at which the $N=50$ nuclei are important for stellar electron capture, forbidden transitions contribute noticeably to the capture rate. Our results indicate that the neutron-rich $N=50$ nuclei do not serve as an obstacle of electron capture during the supernova collapse.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.