Paper detail

UHECRs mass composition from $X_{\rm max}$ distributions

The atmospheric depth where the energy deposit profile of secondary particles from extensive air showers (EAS) reaches its maximum, $X_{\rm max}$, is related to the primary particle mass. The mass composition of the ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) can be inferred from measurements of $X_{\rm max}$ distributions in each energy interval, by fitting these distributions with Monte Carlo (MC) templates for four primary species (p, He, N and Fe). On the basis of simulations, we show that a high abundance of some intermediate elements in the $X_{\rm max}$ distributions, e.g. Ne or Si, may affect the quality of the fit and also the reconstructed fractions of different species with respect to their true values. We propose a method for finding the "best combination" of elements in each energy interval from a larger set of primaries (p, He, C, N, O, Ne, Si and Fe) which best describes the $X_{\rm max}$ distributions. Applying this method to the $X_{\rm max}$ distributions measured by the Pierre Auger Observatory (2014), we found that the "best combination" of elements which best describe the data suggest the presence of Ne or Si in some low energy bins for the EPOS-LHC model.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.