Paper detail

Typical Performance of Approximation Algorithms for NP-hard Problems

Typical performance of approximation algorithms is studied for randomized minimum vertex cover problems. A wide class of random graph ensembles characterized by an arbitrary degree distribution is discussed with some theoretical frameworks. Here three approximation algorithms are examined; the linear-programming relaxation, the loopy-belief propagation, and the leaf-removal algorithm. The former two algorithms are analyzed using the statistical-mechanical technique while the average-case analysis of the last one is studied by the generating function method. These algorithms have a threshold in the typical performance with increasing the average degree of the random graph, below which they find true optimal solutions with high probability. Our study reveals that there exist only three cases determined by the order of the typical-performance thresholds. We provide some conditions for classifying the graph ensembles and demonstrate explicitly examples for the difference in the threshold.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.