Paper detail

Tyger: Task-Type-Generic Active Learning for Molecular Property Prediction

How to accurately predict the properties of molecules is an essential problem in AI-driven drug discovery, which generally requires a large amount of annotation for training deep learning models. Annotating molecules, however, is quite costly because it requires lab experiments conducted by experts. To reduce annotation cost, deep Active Learning (AL) methods are developed to select only the most representative and informative data for annotating. However, existing best deep AL methods are mostly developed for a single type of learning task (e.g., single-label classification), and hence may not perform well in molecular property prediction that involves various task types. In this paper, we propose a Task-type-generic active learning framework (termed Tyger) that is able to handle different types of learning tasks in a unified manner. The key is to learn a chemically-meaningful embedding space and perform active selection fully based on the embeddings, instead of relying on task-type-specific heuristics (e.g., class-wise prediction probability) as done in existing works. Specifically, for learning the embedding space, we instantiate a querying module that learns to translate molecule graphs into corresponding SMILES strings. Furthermore, to ensure that samples selected from the space are both representative and informative, we propose to shape the embedding space by two learning objectives, one based on domain knowledge and the other leveraging feedback from the task learner (i.e., model that performs the learning task at hand). We conduct extensive experiments on benchmark datasets of different task types. Experimental results show that Tyger consistently achieves high AL performance on molecular property prediction, outperforming baselines by a large margin. We also perform ablative experiments to verify the effectiveness of each component in Tyger.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.