Paper detail

Two Sufficient Conditions for a Polyhedron to be (Locally) Rupert

Given two cubes of equal size, it is possible - against all odds - to bore a hole through one which is large enough to pass the other straight through. This preposterous property of the cube was first noted by Prince Rupert of the Rhine in the 17th century. Surprisingly, the cube is not alone: many other polyhedra have this property, which we call being Rupert. A concise way to express that a polyhedron is Rupert is to find two orientations $Q$ and $Q'$ of that polyhedron so that $π(Q)$ fits inside $π(Q')$, with $π$ representing the orthogonal projection onto the $xy$-plane. Given this scheme, to bore the hole in $Q'$ we can remove $π^{-1}(π(Q))$. There is an open conjecture that every convex polyhedron is Rupert. Aiming at this conjecture, we give two sufficient conditions for a polyhedron to be Rupert. Both conditions require the polyhedron to have a particularly simple orientation $Q$, which we alter by a very small amount to get $Q'$ as required above. When a passage is given by a very small alteration like this, we call it a local passage. Restricting to the local case turns out to offer many valuable simplifications. In the process of proving our main theorems, we develop a theory of these local passages, involving an analysis of how small rotations act on simple polyhedra.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.