Paper detail

Two-stage Online Reusable Resource Allocation: Reservation, Overbooking and Confirmation Call

We study a two-stage online reusable resource allocation problem over T days involving advance reservations and walk-ins. Each day begins with a reservation stage (Stage I), where reservation requests arrive sequentially. When service starts (Stage II), both reserved and walk-in customers arrive to check in and occupy resources for several days. Reserved customers can cancel without penalty before or during a confirmation call initiated by the decision maker (DM) before day's end. The DM must immediately accept or reject each booking or check-in request, potentially overbooking by accepting more reservations than capacity. An overbooking loss occurs if a reserved customer's check-in is rejected in Stage II; a reward is obtained for each occupied resource unit daily. Our goal is to develop an online policy that controls bookings and check-ins to maximize total revenue over the T-day horizon. We show that due to cancellation uncertainties and complex correlations between occupancy durations, any online policy incurs a regret of Ω(T) compared to the offline optimal policy when the \textit{busy season} assumption does not hold. To address this, we introduce decoupled adaptive safety stocks, which use only single-day information to hedge against overbooking risks and reduce resource idling. Under the busy season condition, our policy decouples the overall offline optimal into single-day offline optimal policies. Consequently, the regret between our policy and the offline optimal decays exponentially with the time between the confirmation call and day's end, suggesting the DM can delay confirmation calls while maintaining near-optimal performance. We validate our algorithm through sythetic experiments and empirical data from an Algarve resort hotel.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.