Paper detail

Two proofs of Størmer's theorem

The structure of the set of positivity-preserving maps between matrix algebras is notoriously difficult to describe. The notable exceptions are the results by Størmer and Woronowicz from 1960s and 1970s settling the low dimensional cases. By duality, these results are equivalent to the Peres-Horodecki positive partial transpose criterion being able to unambiguously establish whether a state in a 2 x 2 or 2 x 3 quantum system is entangled or separable. However, even in these low dimensional cases, the existing arguments (known to the authors) were based on long and seemingly ad hoc computations. We present a simple proof, based on Brouwer's fixed point theorem, for the 2 x 2 case (Størmer's theorem). For completeness, we also include another argument (following the classical outline, but highly streamlined) based on a characterization of extreme self-maps of the Lorentz cone and on a link - noticed by R. Hildebrand - to the S-lemma, a well-known fact from control theory and quadratic/semi-definite programming.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.