Paper detail

Two-parameter Radial Equilibrium Models for Field-Reversed Configurations

A new equilibrium pressure profile extending the Rigid-Rotor (RR) model with a simple unified expression $P=P(ψ;β_{s},α, σ)$ for both inside and outside the separatrix is proposed, in which the radial normalized field-reversed configuration (FRC) equilibrium profiles for pressure, magnetic field, and current can be determined by only two dimensionless parameters $β_s\equiv P_s/2μ_0B_e^2$ and $δ_s\equiv L_{ps}/R_s$, where $P_s$ is the thermal pressure at the separatrix, $B_e$ is the external magnetic field strength, $L_{ps}$ is the pressure profile scale length at the separatrix, and $R_s$ is the separatrix radius. This modified rigid rotor (MRR) model has sufficient flexibility to accommodate the narrow scrape of layer (SOL) width and hollow current density profiles, and can be used to fit experimental measurements satisfactorily. Detailed one-dimensional (1D) characteristics of the new MRR model are investigated analytically and numerically, and the results are also confirmed in two-dimensional (2D) numerical equilibrium solutions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.