Paper detail

Two Interesting Properties of the Exponential Distribution

Let $X_1, X_2,\ldots, X_n$ be $n$ independent and identically distributed random variables, here $n \geq 2.$ Let $X_{(1)}, X_{(2)}, \ldots, X_{(n)}$ be the order statistics of $X_1, X_2,..., X_n.$ In this note we proved that: (I) If $X_1, X_2,..., X_n$ are exponential random variables with parameter $c > 0,$ then the "correlation coefficient" between $X_{(k)}$ and $X_{(k+t)}$ is strictly increasing in $k$ from $1$ to $m,$ and then is strictly decreasing in $k$ from $m$ to $n - t,$ here $t$ is a fixed integer between $1$ and $n - 3,$ and $m = (n - t)/2$ if $n - t$ is even, $m = (n - t + 1)/2$ if $n - t$ is odd. We also proved that if $t = n - 2$, then the "correlation coefficient" between $X_{(1)}$ and $X_{(n-1)}$ is greater than the "correlation coefficient" between $X_{(2)}$ and$X_{(n)}.$ (II) The "correlation coefficient" between $X_{(k)}$ and $X_{(k+t)}$ for the exponential random variables is always less than the "correlation coefficient" between $X_{(k)}$ and $X_{(k+t)}$ for the uniform random variables for all $k$ and $t$ such that $k + t \leq n.$ A combinatorial identity is also given as a bi-product. \vs

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.