Paper detail

Two-Higgs-Doublet Models and Enhanced Rates for a 125 GeV Higgs

We examine the level of enhancement that can be achieved in the ZZ and γγchannels for a two-Higgs-doublet model Higgs boson (either the light h or the heavy H) with mass near 125 GeV after imposing all constraints from LEP data, B physics, precision electroweak data, vacuum stability, unitarity and perturbativity. The latter constraints restrict substantially the possibilities for enhancing the gg -> h -> γγor gg -> H -> γγsignal relative to that for the SM Higgs, hSM. Further, we find that a significant enhancement of the gg -> h -> γγor gg -> H -> γγsignal in Type II models is possible only if the gg -> h -> ZZ or gg -> H -> ZZ mode is even more enhanced, a situation disfavored by current data. In contrast, in the Type I model one can achieve enhanced rates in the γγfinal state for the h while having the ZZ mode at or below the SM rate - the largest [gg -> h -> γγ]/[gg -> hSM -> γγ] ratio found is of order ~1.3 when the two Higgs doublet vacuum expectation ratio is tanβ= 4 or 20 and the charged Higgs boson has its minimal LEP-allowed value of m_{H^\pm} = 90 GeV.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.