Paper detail

Two-body hadronic charmed meson decays

We study in this work the two-body hadronic charmed meson decays, including both the PP and VP modes. The latest experimental data are first analyzed in the diagrammatic approach. The magnitudes and strong phases of the flavor amplitudes are extracted from the Cabibbo-favored (CF) decay modes using $χ^2$ minimization. The best-fitted values are then used to predict the branching fractions of the singly-Cabibbo-suppressed (SCS) and doubly-Cabibbo-suppressed decay modes in the flavor SU(3) symmetry limit. We observe significant SU(3) breaking effects in some of SCS channels. In the case of VP modes, we point out that the $A_P$ and $A_V$ amplitudes cannot be completely determined based on currently available data. We conjecture that the quoted experimental results for both $D_s^+\to\bar K^0K^{*+}$ and $D_s^+\to ρ^+η'$ are overestimated. We compare the sizes of color-allowed and color-suppressed tree amplitudes extracted from the diagrammatical approach with the effective parameters $a_1$ and $a_2$ defined in the factorization approach. The ratio $|a_2/a_1|$ is more or less universal among the $D \to {\bar K} π$, ${\bar K}^* π$ and ${\bar K} ρ$ modes. This feature allows us to discriminate between different solutions of topological amplitudes. For the long-standing puzzle about the ratio $Γ(D^0\to K^+K^-)/Γ(D^0\toπ^+π^-)$, we argue that, in addition to the SU(3) breaking effect in the spectator amplitudes, the long-distance resonant contribution through the nearby resonance $f_0(1710)$ can naturally explain why $D^0$ decays more copiously to $K^+ K^-$ than $π^+ π^-$ through the $W$-exchange topology.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.