Paper detail

TweetDIS: A Large Twitter Dataset for Natural Disasters Built using Weak Supervision

Social media is often utilized as a lifeline for communication during natural disasters. Traditionally, natural disaster tweets are filtered from the Twitter stream using the name of the natural disaster and the filtered tweets are sent for human annotation. The process of human annotation to create labeled sets for machine learning models is laborious, time consuming, at times inaccurate, and more importantly not scalable in terms of size and real-time use. In this work, we curate a silver standard dataset using weak supervision. In order to validate its utility, we train machine learning models on the weakly supervised data to identify three different types of natural disasters i.e earthquakes, hurricanes and floods. Our results demonstrate that models trained on the silver standard dataset achieved performance greater than 90% when classifying a manually curated, gold-standard dataset. To enable reproducible research and additional downstream utility, we release the silver standard dataset for the scientific community.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.