Paper detail

Turbulent Schmidt Number Measurements Over Three-Dimensional Cubic Arrays

We present turbulent Schmidt number Sc_t estimations above three-dimensional urban canopies, where Sc_t is a property of the flow defined as the ratio of the eddy diffusivity of momentum (K_M) to the eddy diffusivity of mass (D_t). Despite the fact that Sc_t modelling is of great interest, inter alia, for pollutant dispersion simulations conducted via computational fluid dynamics, no universal value is known. Simultaneous measurements of fluid velocity and mass concentration are carried out in a water channel for three staggered arrays of cubical obstacles corresponding to isolated flow, wake-interference, and skimming-flow regimes. A passive tracer is released from a continuous point source located at a height z=1.67H, where H is the obstacle height. The results show an increase of Sc_t with height above the canopy for all three arrays, with values at z=2H (Sc_t = 0.6) about double compared to that at z=H. The observed Sc_t agrees well with that modelled by using a simple formulation for Sc_t based on expressions for K_M and D_t published in previous studies. Comparisons with other Sc_t models found in the literature are also presented and discussed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.