Paper detail

Tunable magnetic order in low-symmetry SeO$_3$ ligand linked $TM_3$(SeO$_3$)$_3$H$_2$O ($TM$ = Mn, Co and Ni) compounds

Generally, one has two strategies to achieve magnetic frustration: through geometric means or interactions with different length scales. As the former leads to much simpler theoretical treatments it is favored and so magnetic sublattices with geometric frustration are sought after. One approach to finding such lattices is to design them chemically by using non-magnetic linker ligands. Here we report on the magnetic properties of one such family of materials, the transition metal ($TM$) selenite hydrate compounds chemical formula $TM_3$(SeO$_3$)$_3$H$_2$O . These materials link highly distorted $TM$O$_6$ octahedra via non-magnetic [SeO$_3$]$^{2+}$ linkers. Using $TM$ = Mn, Co and Ni we report on the structural effects of changing the $TM$ site and how they may influence the magnetic structure. Using magnetic susceptibility and neutron powder diffraction we identify low temperature magnetic transitions for all three compounds characterized by the onset of long-range AFM order with moderate frustration indexes. Consideration of the magnetic structures reveal that the magnetic order is sensitive to the $TM$ site ion and is tunable as it is changed - especially from Mn to Co - with changes in both the moment direction and the ordering vector. Field dependent susceptibility and heat capacity measurements reveal metamagnetic transitions in both Mn$_3$(SeO$_3$)$_3$H$_2$O and Co$_3$(SeO$_3$)$_3$H$_2$O indicating nearby magnetic ground states accessible under relatively small applied fields. Density functional theory calculations broadly confirm these results, showing both a sensitivity of the magnetic structure to the $TM$ and its local environment. Although no spin liquid behavior is achieved, these results suggest the fruitfulness of such synthesis philosophies and encourage future work to engender higher frustration in these materials via doping, field, pressure or larger linker ligands.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.