Paper detail

Trust Aware Emergency Response for A Resilient Human-Swarm Cooperative System

A human-swarm cooperative system, which mixes multiple robots and a human supervisor to form a heterogeneous team, is widely used for emergent scenarios such as criminal tracking in social security and victim assistance in a natural disaster. These emergent scenarios require a cooperative team to quickly terminate the current task and transit the system to a new task, bringing difficulty in motion planning. Moreover, due to the immediate task transitions, uncertainty from both physical systems and prior tasks is accumulated to decrease swarm performance, causing robot failures and influencing the cooperation effectiveness between the human and the robot swarm. Therefore, given the quick-transition requirements and the introduced uncertainty, it is challenging for a human-swarm system to respond to emergent tasks, compared with executing normal tasks where a gradual transition between tasks is allowed. Human trust reveals the behavior expectations of others and is used to adjust unsatisfactory behaviors for better cooperation. Inspired by human trust, in this paper, a trust-aware reflective control (Trust-R) is developed to dynamically calibrate human-swarm cooperation. Trust-R, based on a weighted mean subsequence reduced algorithm (WMSR) and human trust modeling, helps a swarm to self-reflect its performance from the perspective of human trust; then proactively correct its faulty behaviors in an early stage before a human intervenes. One typical task scenario {emergency response} was designed in the real-gravity simulation environment, and a human user study with 145 volunteers was conducted. Trust-R's effectiveness in correcting faulty behaviors in emergency response was validated by the improved swarm performance and increased trust scores.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.