Paper detail

Triggered di-hadron correlations in Pb--Pb collisions from the ALICE experiment

Angular correlations between unidentified hadron trigger and associated particles are measured by the ALICE experiment for $0.5 < p_T^{t,a} < 15$ GeV, where $\ptt \geq \pta$. The pair correlation shapes are examined in a variety of centrality categories for pairs in $|η| < 1.0$ where $|η^t - η^a| > 0.8$. A series of two-particle Fourier components $V_{nΔ} \equiv <\cos(nΔϕ)>$ are extracted from the long-range azimuthal correlation functions. The sum of $n<6$ terms match the data. For each $n$, a fit is applied over all $p_{T}$ bins simultaneously to test the collectivity hypothesis $V_{nΔ} \simeq v_n^t \, v_n^a$. The factorization holds at $p_{T}^{t,a}$ below approximately 4 GeV but breaks progressively at higher momenta. The divergence between the data and the global fit quantifies the onset of nonflow dominance in long-range correlations due to the away side jet. The $v_n$ values from the global fit are in close agreement with results from more established methods. At higher \pt where jet correlations dominate, the modification of conditional yields in central Pb--Pb collisions is measured with respect to $pp$ ($I_{AA}$) and with respect to peripheral events ($I_{CP}$). Significant suppression is observed on the side opposing the trigger, while a moderate enhancement is measured on the near side.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.