Paper detail

Trigger detection for adaptive scientific workflows using percentile sampling

Increasing complexity of scientific simulations and HPC architectures are driving the need for adaptive workflows, where the composition and execution of computational and data manipulation steps dynamically depend on the evolutionary state of the simulation itself. Consider for example, the frequency of data storage. Critical phases of the simulation should be captured with high frequency and with high fidelity for post-analysis, however we cannot afford to retain the same frequency for the full simulation due to the high cost of data movement. We can instead look for triggers, indicators that the simulation will be entering a critical phase and adapt the workflow accordingly. We present a method for detecting triggers and demonstrate its use in direct numerical simulations of turbulent combustion using S3D. We show that chemical explosive mode analysis (CEMA) can be used to devise a noise-tolerant indicator for rapid increase in heat release. However, exhaustive computation of CEMA values dominates the total simulation, thus is prohibitively expensive. To overcome this bottleneck, we propose a quantile-sampling approach. Our algorithm comes with provable error/confidence bounds, as a function of the number of samples. Most importantly, the number of samples is independent of the problem size, thus our proposed algorithm offers perfect scalability. Our experiments on homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) and reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI) simulations show that the proposed method can detect rapid increases in heat release, and its computational overhead is negligible. Our results will be used for dynamic workflow decisions about data storage and mesh resolution in future combustion simulations. Proposed framework is generalizable and we detail how it could be applied to a broad class of scientific simulation workflows.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.