Paper detail

Trapping in Self-Avoiding Walks with Nearest-Neighbor Attraction

The statistics of self-avoiding random walks have been used to model polymer physics for decades. A self-avoiding walk that grows one step at a time on a lattice will eventually trap itself, which occurs after an average of 71 steps on a square lattice. Here, we consider the effect of nearest-neighbor attractive interactions on the growing self-avoiding walk, and examine the effect that self-attraction has both on the statistics of trapping as well as on chain statistics through the transition between expanded and collapsed walks at the theta point. We find the trapping length increases exponentially with the nearest-neighbor contact energy, but that there is a local minimum in trapping length for weakly self-attractive walks. While it has been controversial whether growing self-avoiding walks have the same asymptotic behavior as traditional self-avoiding walks, we find that the theta point is not at the same location for growing self-avoiding walks, and that the persistence length converges much more rapidly to a smaller value.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.