Paper detail

Transition of thermal rectification in silicon nanocones

Current understanding of thermal rectification asserts that the rectification ratio (R), which measures the relative heat flux between two ends of a nanostructure, is determined by its geometric asymmetry. The higher the asymmetry, the higher the R. However, by using nonequilibrium molecular dynamics method we have calculated thermal transport in Si nanocones as an example, the results show that such an understanding may be incorrect and R may not increase monotonically with geometric asymmetry. Rather, R exhibits a sharp reverse when the vertex angle (θ) of the nanocone is approximately 90°. In other words, when θ > 90°, R decreases, rather than increasing. We show that this abnormal behavior is originated from a change in the thermal transport mechanism. At small θs, phonon transport is dominated by localized modes, especially for transport from tip to bottom. At large θs, however, these localized modes disappear, leading to R decrease.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.