Paper detail

Transition from the annealed to the quenched asymptotics for a random walk on random obstacles

In this work we study a natural transition mechanism describing the passage from a quenched (almost sure) regime to an annealed (in average) one, for a symmetric simple random walk on random obstacles on sites having an identical and independent law. The transition mechanism we study was first proposed in the context of sums of identical independent random exponents by Ben Arous, Bogachev and Molchanov in [Probab. Theory Related Fields 132 (2005) 579--612]. Let $p(x,t)$ be the survival probability at time $t$ of the random walk, starting from site $x$, and let $L(t)$ be some increasing function of time. We show that the empirical average of $p(x,t)$ over a box of side $L(t)$ has different asymptotic behaviors depending on $L(t)$. T here are constants $0<γ_1<γ_2$ such that if $L(t)\ge e^{γt^{d/(d+2)}}$, with $γ>γ_1$, a law of large numbers is satisfied and the empirical survival probability decreases like the annealed one; if $L(t)\ge e^{γt^{d/(d+2)}}$, with $γ>γ_2$, also a central limit theorem is satisfied. If ${L(t)\ll t}$, the averaged survival probability decreases like the quenched survival probability. If $t\ll L(t)$ and $\log L(t)\ll t^{d/(d+2)}$ we obtain an intermediate regime. Furthermore, when the dimension $d=1$ it is possible to describe the fluctuations of the averaged survival probability when $L(t)=e^{γt^{d/(d+2)}}$ with $γ<γ_2$: it is shown that they are infinitely divisible laws with a Lévy spectral function which explodes when $x\to0$ as stable laws of characteristic exponent $α<2$. These results show that the quenched and annealed survival probabilities correspond to a low- and high-temperature behavior of a mean-field type phase transition mechanism.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.