Paper detail

Transition dynamics in aging systems: microscopic origin of logarithmic time evolution

There exists compelling experimental evidence in numerous systems for logarithmically slow time evolution, yet its theoretical understanding remains elusive. We here introduce and study a generic transition process in complex systems, based on non-renewal, aging waiting times. Each state n of the system follows a local clock initiated at t=0. The random time τbetween clock ticks follows the waiting time density ψ(τ). Transitions between states occur only at local clock ticks and are hence triggered by the local forward waiting time, rather than by ψ(τ). For power-law forms ψ(τ) ~ τ^{-1-α} (0<α<1) we obtain a logarithmic time evolution of the state number <n(t)> ~ log(t/t_0), while for α>2 the process becomes normal in the sense that <n(t)> ~ t. In the intermediate range 1<α<2 we find the power-law growth <n(t)> ~ t^{α-1}. Our model provides a universal description for transition dynamics between aging and non-aging states.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.