Paper detail

Towards the understanding of fully-heavy tetraquark states from various models

We use a color-magnetic interaction model (CMIM), a traditional constituent quark model (CQM) and a multiquark color flux-tube model (MCFTM) to systematically investigate the properties of the states $[Q_1Q_2][\bar{Q}_3\bar{Q}_4]$ ($Q=c,b$). The dynamical investigation indicates that the CMIM can not completely absorb QCD dynamical effects through the effective constituent quark mass and overestimates the color-magnetic interaction in the states under the assumption of the same spatial configurations. The Coulomb interaction plays a critical role in the dynamical model calculations on the heavy hadrons, which induces the fact that none of bound states $[Q_1Q_2][\bar{Q}_3\bar{Q}_4]$ can be found in the dynamical models. The color configuration $\left[[Q_1Q_2]_{\mathbf{6}_c}[\bar{Q}_3\bar{Q}_4]_{\bar{\mathbf{6}}_c}\right]_{\mathbf{1}}$ should be taken seriously in the ground states due to the strong Coulomb attraction between the $[Q_1Q_2]_{\mathbf{6}_c}$ and $[\bar{Q}_3\bar{Q}_4]_{\bar{\mathbf{6}}_c}$. The color configuration $\left[[Q_1Q_2]_{\bar{\mathbf{3}}_c}[\bar{Q}_2\bar{Q}_4]_{\mathbf{3}_c}\right]_{\mathbf{1}}$ is absolutely dominant in the excited states because of the strong Coulomb attraction within the $[Q_1Q_2]_{\bar{\mathbf{3}}_c}$ and $[\bar{Q}_2\bar{Q}_4]_{\mathbf{3}_c}$. The $J/Ψ$-pair resonances recently observed by LHCb are difficult to be accommodated in the CMIM. The broad structure ranging from 6.2 to 6.8 GeV can be described as the ground tetraquark state $[cc][\bar{c}\bar{c}]$ in the various dynamical models. The narrow structure $X(6900)$ can be identified as the excited state $[cc][\bar{c}\bar{c}]$ with $L=1$ ($L=2$) in the CQM (MCFTM).

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.