Paper detail

Towards super-approximation in positive characteristic

In this note we show that the family of Cayley graphs of a finitely generated subgroup of ${\rm GL}_{n_0}(\mathbb{F}_p(t))$ modulo some admissible square-free polynomials is a family of expanders under certain algebraic conditions. Here is a more precise formulation of our main result. For a positive integer $c_0$, we say a square-free polynomial is $c_0$-admissible if degree of irreducible factors of $f$ are distinct integers with prime factors at least $c_0$. Suppose $Ω$ is a finite symmetric subset of ${\rm GL}_{n_0}(\mathbb{F}_p(t))$, where $p$ is a prime more than $5$. Let $Γ$ be the group generated by $Ω$. Suppose the Zariski-closure of $Γ$ is connected, simply-connected, and absolutely almost simple; further assume that the field generated by the traces of ${\rm Ad}(Γ)$ is $\mathbb{F}_p(t)$. Then for some positive integer $c_0$ the family of Cayley graphs ${\rm Cay}(π_{f(x)}(Γ),π_{f(x)}(Ω))$ as $f$ ranges in the set of $c_0$-admissible polynomials is a family of expanders, where $π_{f(t)}$ is the quotient map for the congruence modulo $f(t)$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.