Paper detail

Towards Model Selection for Local Log-Density Estimation. Fisher and Wilks-type theorems

The aim of this research is to make a step towards providing a tool for model selection for log-density estimation. The author revisits the procedure for local log-density estimation suggested by Clive Loader (1996) and extends the theoretical results to finite-sample framework with the help of machinery of Spokoiny (2012). The results include bias expression from "deterministic" counterpart and Fisher and Wilks-type theorems from "stochastic". We elaborate on bandwidth trade-off $ h(n) = \arg\min O(h^p) + O_p(1/\sqrt{nh^d}) $ with explicit constants at big O notation. Explicit expressions involve (i) true density function and (ii) model that is selected (dimension, bandwidth, kernel and basis, e.g. polynomial). Existing asymptotic properties directly follow from our results. From the expressions obtained it is possible to control "the curse of dimension" both from the side of log-density smoothness and the inner space dimension.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.