Paper detail

Towards interpreting ML-based automated malware detection models: a survey

Malware is being increasingly threatening and malware detectors based on traditional signature-based analysis are no longer suitable for current malware detection. Recently, the models based on machine learning (ML) are developed for predicting unknown malware variants and saving human strength. However, most of the existing ML models are black-box, which made their pre-diction results undependable, and therefore need further interpretation in order to be effectively deployed in the wild. This paper aims to examine and categorize the existing researches on ML-based malware detector interpretability. We first give a detailed comparison over the previous work on common ML model inter-pretability in groups after introducing the principles, attributes, evaluation indi-cators and taxonomy of common ML interpretability. Then we investigate the interpretation methods towards malware detection, by addressing the importance of interpreting malware detectors, challenges faced by this field, solutions for migitating these challenges, and a new taxonomy for classifying all the state-of-the-art malware detection interpretability work in recent years. The highlight of our survey is providing a new taxonomy towards malware detection interpreta-tion methods based on the common taxonomy summarized by previous re-searches in the common field. In addition, we are the first to evaluate the state-of-the-art approaches by interpretation method attributes to generate the final score so as to give insight to quantifying the interpretability. By concluding the results of the recent researches, we hope our work can provide suggestions for researchers who are interested in the interpretability on ML-based malware de-tection models.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.