Paper detail

Towards fully automatized GW band structure calculations: What we can learn from 60.000 self-energy evaluations

We analyze a data set comprising 370 GW band structures composed of 61716 quasiparticle (QP) energies of two-dimensional (2D) materials spanning 14 crystal structures and 52 elements. The data results from PAW plane wave based one-shot G$_0$W$_0$@PBE calculations with full frequency integration. We investigate the distribution of key quantities like the QP self-energy corrections and renormalization factor $Z$ and explore their dependence on chemical composition and magnetic state. The linear QP approximation is identified as a significant error source and propose schemes for controlling and drastically reducing this error at low computational cost. We analyze the reliability of the $1/N_\text{PW}$ basis set extrapolation and find that is well-founded with narrow distributions of $r^2$ peaked very close to 1. Finally, we explore the validity of the scissors operator approximation concluding that it is generally not valid for reasonable error tolerances. Our work represents a step towards the development of automatized workflows for high-throughput G$_0$W$_0$ band structure calculations for solids.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.