Paper detail

Towards Distributed 2-Approximation Steiner Minimal Trees in Billion-edge Graphs

Given an edge-weighted graph and a set of known seed vertices, a network scientist often desires to understand the graph relationships to explain connections between the seed vertices. When the seed set is 3 or larger Steiner minimal tree - min-weight acyclic connected subgraph (of the input graph) that contains all the seed vertices - is an attractive generalization of shortest weighted paths. In general, computing a Steiner minimal tree is NP-hard, but several polynomial-time algorithms have been designed and proven to yield Steiner trees whose total weight is bounded within 2 times the Steiner minimal tree. In this paper, we present a parallel 2-approximation Steiner minimal tree algorithm and its MPI-based distributed implementation. In place of distance computation between all pairs of seed vertices, an expensive phase in many algorithms, our solution exploits Voronoi cell computation. Also, this approach has higher parallel efficiency than others that involve minimum spanning tree computation on the entire graph. Furthermore, our distributed design exploits asynchronous processing and a message prioritization scheme to accelerate convergence of distance computation, and harnesses both vertex and edge centric processing to offer fast time-to-solution. We demonstrate scalability and performance of our solution using real-world graphs with up to 128 billion edges and 512 compute nodes (8K processes). We compare our solution with the state-of-the-art exact Steiner minimal tree solver, SCIP-Jack, and two serial algorithms. Our solution comfortably outperforms these related works on graphs with 10s million edges and offers decent strong scaling - up to 90% efficient. We empirically show that, on average, the total distance of the Steiner tree identified by our solution is 1.0527 times greater than the Steiner minimal tree - well within the theoretical bound of less than equal to 2.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.