Paper detail

Towards Deep Learning Methods for Quality Assessment of Computer-Generated Imagery

Video gaming streaming services are growing rapidly due to new services such as passive video streaming, e.g. Twitch.tv, and cloud gaming, e.g. Nvidia Geforce Now. In contrast to traditional video content, gaming content has special characteristics such as extremely high motion for some games, special motion patterns, synthetic content and repetitive content, which makes the state-of-the-art video and image quality metrics perform weaker for this special computer generated content. In this paper, we outline our plan to build a deep learningbased quality metric for video gaming quality assessment. In addition, we present initial results by training the network based on VMAF values as a ground truth to give some insights on how to build a metric in future. The paper describes the method that is used to choose an appropriate Convolutional Neural Network architecture. Furthermore, we estimate the size of the required subjective quality dataset which achieves a sufficiently high performance. The results show that by taking around 5k images for training of the last six modules of Xception, we can obtain a relatively high performance metric to assess the quality of distorted video games.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.