Paper detail

Towards Comparing Performance of Algorithms in Hardware and Software

In this paper, we report on a preliminary investigation of the potential performance gain of programs implemented in field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) using a high-level language Chisel compared to ordinary high-level software implementations executed on general-purpose computers and small and cheap computers. FPGAs inherently support parallel evaluations, while sequential computers do not. For this preliminary investigation, we have chosen a highly parallelizable program as a case study to show an upper bound of performance gain. The purpose is to demonstrate whether or not programming FPGAs has the potential for performance optimizations of ordinary programs. We have developed and evaluated Conway's Game of Life for an FPGA, a small and cheap computer Raspberry Pi 4, and a MacBook Pro Laptop. We have compared the performance of programs over different input sizes to decide the relative increase in runtime.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.