BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Martin Schoeberl

Martin Schoeberl contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Hardware ArchitecturePerformanceProgramming LanguagesSoftware Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Energy Consumption and Performance of Heapsort in Hardware and Software

In this poster abstract we will report on a case study on implementing the Heapsort algorithm in hardware and software and comparing their time and energy consumption. Our experiment shows that the Hardware implementation is more energy efficient, but slower than the Software implementation due to a low clock frequency. It also indicate that the optimal degree of parallelization differs when optimizing for time compared to optimizing for time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Towards Comparing Performance of Algorithms in Hardware and Software

In this paper, we report on a preliminary investigation of the potential performance gain of programs implemented in field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) using a high-level language Chisel compared to ordinary high-level software implementations executed on general-purpose computers and small and cheap computers. FPGAs inherently support parallel evaluations, while sequential computers do not. For this preliminary investigation, we have chosen a highly parallelizable program as a case study to show an upper bound of performance gain. The purpose is to demonstrate whether or not programming FPGAs has the potential for performance optimizations of ordinary programs. We have developed and evaluated Conway's Game of Life for an FPGA, a small and cheap computer Raspberry Pi 4, and a MacBook Pro Laptop. We have compared the performance of programs over different input sizes to decide the relative increase in runtime.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Open-Source Verification with Chisel and Scala

Performance increase with general-purpose processors has come to a halt. We can no longer depend on Moore's Law to increase computing performance. The only way to achieve higher performance or lower energy consumption is by building domain-specific hardware accelerators. To efficiently design and verify those domain-specific accelerators, we need agile hardware development. One of the main obstacles when proposing such a modern method is the lack of modern tools to attack it. To be able to verify a design in such a time-constrained development method, one needs to have efficient tools both for design and verification. This paper thus proposes ChiselVerify, an open-source tool for verifying circuits described in any Hardware Description Language. It builds on top of the Chisel hardware construction language and uses Scala to drive the verification using a testing strategy inspired by the Universal Verification Methodology (UVM) and adapted for designs described in Chisel. ChiselVerify is created based on three key ideas. First, our solution highly increases the productivity of the verification engineer, by allowing hardware testing to be done in a modern high-level programming environment. Second, the framework functions with any hardware description language thanks to the flexibility of Chisel blackboxes. Finally, the solution is well integrated into the existing Chisel universe, making it an extension of currently existing testing libraries. We implement ChiselVerify in a way inspired by the functionalities found in SystemVerilog. This allows one to use functional coverage, constrained-random verification, bus functional models, transaction-level modeling and much more during the verification process of a design in a contemporary high-level programming ecosystem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access