Paper detail

Towards Automated Assessment of Stuttering and Stuttering Therapy

Stuttering is a complex speech disorder that can be identified by repetitions, prolongations of sounds, syllables or words, and blocks while speaking. Severity assessment is usually done by a speech therapist. While attempts at automated assessment were made, it is rarely used in therapy. Common methods for the assessment of stuttering severity include percent stuttered syllables (% SS), the average of the three longest stuttering symptoms during a speech task, or the recently introduced Speech Efficiency Score (SES). This paper introduces the Speech Control Index (SCI), a new method to evaluate the severity of stuttering. Unlike SES, it can also be used to assess therapy success for fluency shaping. We evaluate both SES and SCI on a new comprehensively labeled dataset containing stuttered German speech of clients prior to, during, and after undergoing stuttering therapy. Phone alignments of an automatic speech recognition system are statistically evaluated in relation to their relative position to labeled stuttering events. The results indicate that phone length distributions differ with respect to their position in and around labeled stuttering events

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.