Paper detail

Towards a Science of Resilient Robotic Autonomy

This discussion paper aims to support the argument process for the need to develop a comprehensive science of resilient robotic autonomy. Resilience and its key characteristics relating to robustness, redundancy, and resourcefulness are discussed, followed by a selected - but not exhaustive - list of research themes and domains that are crucial to facilitate resilient autonomy. Last but not least, an outline of possible directions of a new and enhanced design paradigm in robotics is presented. This manuscript is intentionally short and abstract. It serves to open the discussion and raise questions. The answers will necessarily be found in the actual process of conducting research by the community and in the framework of introducing robotics in an ever increasing set of real-life use cases. Its current form is based on thoughts identified within the ongoing experience of conducting research for robotic systems to gain autonomy in certain types of extreme environments such as subterranean settings, nuclear facilities, agriculture areas, and long-term off-road deployments. The very context of this document will be subject to change and it will be iteratively revisited.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.