Paper detail

Towards a population-informed approach to the definition of data-driven models for structural dynamics

Machine learning has affected the way in which many phenomena for various domains are modelled, one of these domains being that of structural dynamics. However, because machine-learning algorithms are problem-specific, they often fail to perform efficiently in cases of data scarcity. To deal with such issues, combination of physics-based approaches and machine learning algorithms have been developed. Although such methods are effective, they also require the analyser's understanding of the underlying physics of the problem. The current work is aimed at motivating the use of models which learn such relationships from a population of phenomena, whose underlying physics are similar. The development of such models is motivated by the way that physics-based models, and more specifically finite element models, work. Such models are considered transferrable, explainable and trustworthy, attributes which are not trivially imposed or achieved for machine-learning models. For this reason, machine-learning approaches are less trusted by industry and often considered more difficult to form validated models. To achieve such data-driven models, a population-based scheme is followed here and two different machine-learning algorithms from the meta-learning domain are used. The two algorithms are the model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) algorithm and the conditional neural processes (CNP) model. The algorithms seem to perform as intended and outperform a traditional machine-learning algorithm at approximating the quantities of interest. Moreover, they exhibit behaviour similar to traditional machine learning algorithms (e.g. neural networks or Gaussian processes), concerning their performance as a function of the available structures in the training population.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.