Paper detail

Towards a Common Speech Analysis Engine

Recent innovations in self-supervised representation learning have led to remarkable advances in natural language processing. That said, in the speech processing domain, self-supervised representation learning-based systems are not yet considered state-of-the-art. We propose leveraging recent advances in self-supervised-based speech processing to create a common speech analysis engine. Such an engine should be able to handle multiple speech processing tasks, using a single architecture, to obtain state-of-the-art accuracy. The engine must also enable support for new tasks with small training datasets. Beyond that, a common engine should be capable of supporting distributed training with client in-house private data. We present the architecture for a common speech analysis engine based on the HuBERT self-supervised speech representation. Based on experiments, we report our results for language identification and emotion recognition on the standard evaluations NIST-LRE 07 and IEMOCAP. Our results surpass the state-of-the-art performance reported so far on these tasks. We also analyzed our engine on the emotion recognition task using reduced amounts of training data and show how to achieve improved results.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.