Paper detail

Toward Refactoring of DMARF and GIPSY Case Studies -- a Team 4 SOEN6471-S14 Project Report

Software Quality is a major concern in software engineering development in order to be competitive. Such a quality can be achieved by a possible technique called Refactoring where the systems external behavior of the system is not changed. Initially we present our work by analyzing the case studies of ongoing researches of DMARF and GIPSY by understanding their needs and requirements involving the major components in their respective systems. Later sections illustrate the conceptual architecture of these case studies, for this we have referenced the original architecture to draw the important candidate concepts presented in the system, and analyzing their associations with other concepts in the system and then compared this conceptual architecture with the original architectures. Later the document throws light on identifying the code smells exist in the architectures to find them and resolve to minimize the deeper problems. JDeodorant, SonarQube are the tools which we go across for identification and analyzing the source code quality, both these tools are available as an IDE plugin or as an open source platforms. Next is to identify the design patterns exist in the architectures along with their importance and need for existence in respective systems. Finally, the implication is towards introducing refactoring methods onto the smells which have been identified and possibly refactor them accordingly by applying appropriate refactoring methods and showcasing the respective tests to ensure that changes in the architecture does not change the behavior much.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.