BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Afshin Somani

Afshin Somani appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Software Engineering

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

An Empirical Study on Refactoring Activity

This paper reports an empirical study on refactoring activity in three Java software systems. We investigated some questions on refactoring activity, to confirm or disagree on conclusions that have been drawn from previous empirical studies. Unlike previous empirical studies, our study found that it is not always true that there are more refactoring activities before major project release date than after. In contrast, we were able to confirm that software developers perform different types of refactoring operations on test code and production code, specific developers are responsible for refactorings in the project, refactoring edits are not very well tested. Further, floss refactoring is more popular among the developers, refactoring activity is frequent in the projects, majority of bad smells once occurred they persist up to the latest version of the system. By confirming assumptions by other researchers we can have greater confidence that those research conclusions are generalizable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Toward Refactoring of DMARF and GIPSY Case Studies -- a Team 4 SOEN6471-S14 Project Report

Software Quality is a major concern in software engineering development in order to be competitive. Such a quality can be achieved by a possible technique called Refactoring where the systems external behavior of the system is not changed. Initially we present our work by analyzing the case studies of ongoing researches of DMARF and GIPSY by understanding their needs and requirements involving the major components in their respective systems. Later sections illustrate the conceptual architecture of these case studies, for this we have referenced the original architecture to draw the important candidate concepts presented in the system, and analyzing their associations with other concepts in the system and then compared this conceptual architecture with the original architectures. Later the document throws light on identifying the code smells exist in the architectures to find them and resolve to minimize the deeper problems. JDeodorant, SonarQube are the tools which we go across for identification and analyzing the source code quality, both these tools are available as an IDE plugin or as an open source platforms. Next is to identify the design patterns exist in the architectures along with their importance and need for existence in respective systems. Finally, the implication is towards introducing refactoring methods onto the smells which have been identified and possibly refactor them accordingly by applying appropriate refactoring methods and showcasing the respective tests to ensure that changes in the architecture does not change the behavior much.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access