Paper detail

Toward optimal model averaging in regression models with time series errors

Consider a regression model with infinitely many parameters and time series errors. We are interested in choosing weights for averaging across generalized least squares (GLS) estimators obtained from a set of approximating models. However, GLS estimators, depending on the unknown inverse covariance matrix of the errors, are usually infeasible. We therefore construct feasible generalized least squares (FGLS) estimators using a consistent estimator of the unknown inverse matrix. Based on this inverse covariance matrix estimator and FGLS estimators, we develop a feasible autocovariance-corrected Mallows model averaging criterion to select weights, thereby providing an FGLS model averaging estimator of the true regression function. We show that the generalized squared error loss of our averaging estimator is asymptotically equivalent to the minimum one among those of GLS model averaging estimators with the weight vectors belonging to a continuous set, which includes the discrete weight set used in Hansen (2007) as its proper subset.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.