Paper detail

Topological properties of sets represented by an inequality involving distances

Consider a set represented by an inequality. An interesting phenomenon which occurs in various settings in mathematics is that the interior of this set is the subset where strict inequality holds, the boundary is the subset where equality holds, and the closure of the set is the closure of its interior. This paper discusses this phenomenon assuming the set is a Voronoi cell induced by given sites (subsets), a geometric object which appears in many fields of science and technology and has diverse applications. Simple counterexamples show that the discussed phenomenon does not hold in general, but it is established in a wide class of cases. More precisely, the setting is a (possibly infinite dimensional) uniformly convex normed space with arbitrary positively separated sites. An important ingredient in the proof is a strong version of the triangle inequality due to Clarkson (1936), an interesting inequality which has been almost totally forgotten.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.