Paper detail

TiSAT: Time Series Anomaly Transformer

While anomaly detection in time series has been an active area of research for several years, most recent approaches employ an inadequate evaluation criterion leading to an inflated F1 score. We show that a rudimentary Random Guess method can outperform state-of-the-art detectors in terms of this popular but faulty evaluation criterion. In this work, we propose a proper evaluation metric that measures the timeliness and precision of detecting sequential anomalies. Moreover, most existing approaches are unable to capture temporal features from long sequences. Self-attention based approaches, such as transformers, have been demonstrated to be particularly efficient in capturing long-range dependencies while being computationally efficient during training and inference. We also propose an efficient transformer approach for anomaly detection in time series and extensively evaluate our proposed approach on several popular benchmark datasets.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.