Paper detail

Time Series Anomaly Detection by Cumulative Radon Features

Detecting anomalous time series is key for scientific, medical and industrial tasks, but is challenging due to its inherent unsupervised nature. In recent years, progress has been made on this task by learning increasingly more complex features, often using deep neural networks. In this work, we argue that shallow features suffice when combined with distribution distance measures. Our approach models each time series as a high dimensional empirical distribution of features, where each time-point constitutes a single sample. Modeling the distance between a test time series and the normal training set therefore requires efficiently measuring the distance between multivariate probability distributions. We show that by parameterizing each time series using cumulative Radon features, we are able to efficiently and effectively model the distribution of normal time series. Our theoretically grounded but simple-to-implement approach is evaluated on multiple datasets and shown to achieve better results than established, classical methods as well as complex, state-of-the-art deep learning methods. Code is provided.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.