Paper detail

Time Scales for Rounding of Rocks through Stochastic Chipping

For 3D geometries, we consider stones (modeled as convex polyhedra) subject to weathering with planar slices of random orientation and depth successively removing material, ultimately yielding smooth and round (i.e. spherical) shapes. An exponentially decaying acceptance probability in the area exposed by a prospective slice provides a stochastically driven physical basis for the removal of material in fracture events. With a variety of quantitative measures, in steady state we find a power law decay of deviations in a toughness parameter $γ$ from a perfect spherical shape. We examine the time evolution of shapes for stones initially in the form of cubes as well as irregular fragments created by cleaving a regular solid many times along random fracture planes. In the case of the former, we find two sets of second order structural phase transitions with the usual hallmarks of critical behavior. The first involves the simultaneous loss of facets original to the parent solid, while the second of these involves a shift to a spherical profile. Nevertheless, for mono-dispersed irregular solids, the loss of primordial facets is not simultaneous but occurs in stages. In the case of initially irregular stones, strong disorder obscures individual structural transitions, and relevant observables are smooth with respect to time. More broadly, we find that salient times scale quadratically in $γ$. We use the universal dependence of variables on the volume remaining to calculate time dependent variables for a variety of erosion scenarios with results from a single weathering scheme such as the case in which the fracture acceptance probability depends on the relative area of the prospective new face. We calculate time scales for the attainment of structural milestones, obtaining a closed form approximate expression which bounds direct simulation results from above.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.