Paper detail

Time-Reversible Random Number Generators : Solution of Our Challenge by Federico Ricci-Tersenghi

Nearly all the evolution equations of physics are time-reversible, in the sense that a movie of the solution, played backwards, would obey exactly the same differential equations as the original forward solution. By way of contrast, stochastic approaches are typically not time-reversible, though they could be made so by the simple expedient of storing their underlying pseudorandom numbers in an array. Here we illustrate the notion of time-reversible random number generators. In Version 1 we offered a suitable reward for the first arXiv response furnishing a reversed version of an only slightly-more-complicated pseudorandom number generator. Here we include Professor Ricci-Tersenghi's prize-winning reversed version as described in his arXiv:1305.1805 contribution: "The Solution to the Challenge in `Time-Reversible Random Number Generators' by Wm. G. Hoover and Carol G. Hoover".

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.