Paper detail

Tile Multiple-Readout Compensated Calorimetry

We propose extending parallel fiber dual readout calorimetry to tiles, more applicable to many future experimental requirements, with superior energy resolution. Monte Carlo (MC) studies indicate that a tile dual calorimeter including an integral Cerenkov-compensated e-m front end and further longitudinal segmentation, not possible with parallel fibers, has equivalent or better resolution. Besides comparison and tuning with dual tile calorimeter data, a MC can be extended to study other dual and then multiple tile sensors including tiles with higher contrast to em-hadron shower fluctuations with low refractive indices (much lower than quartz or plastic), transition radiation, secondary emission, hydrogenous/non-hydrogenous ionization-sensing, and neutron and ion-fragment sensing tiles for improving dual readout not available with fibers, and beyond to triple or more readout. For example, secondary emission tiles (like dynodes) are very sensitive to ion fragments and low energy neutrons. We suggest MC studies for adding Cerenkov and other tiles to Particle Flow/High Granularity tile calorimeters such CALICE and planned in CMS & ATLAS Phase III upgrades, groups studying future machine(ee,pp,ep) detectors, b-physics, tagged neutrino experiments, and space-based calorimeters.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.