Abstract

We prove a \emph{query complexity} lower bound for approximating the top rr dimensional eigenspace of a matrix. We consider an oracle model where, given a symmetric matrix M∈Rd×d\mathbf{M} \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times d}, an algorithm Alg\mathsf{Alg} is allowed to make T\mathsf{T} exact queries of the form w(i)=Mv(i)\mathsf{w}^{(i)} = \mathbf{M} \mathsf{v}^{(i)} for ii in {1,...,T}\{1,...,\mathsf{T}\}, where v(i)\mathsf{v}^{(i)} is drawn from a distribution which depends arbitrarily on the past queries and measurements {v(j),w(i)}1≤j≤i−1\{\mathsf{v}^{(j)},\mathsf{w}^{(i)}\}_{1 \le j \le i-1}. We show that for every gap∈(0,1/2]\mathtt{gap} \in (0,1/2], there exists a distribution over matrices M\mathbf{M} for which 1) gapr(M)=Ω(gap)\mathrm{gap}_r(\mathbf{M}) = Ω(\mathtt{gap}) (where gapr(M)\mathrm{gap}_r(\mathbf{M}) is the normalized gap between the rr and r+1r+1-st largest-magnitude eigenvector of M\mathbf{M}), and 2) any algorithm Alg\mathsf{Alg} which takes fewer than const×rlog⁡dgap\mathrm{const} \times \frac{r \log d}{\sqrt{\mathtt{gap}}} queries fails (with overwhelming probability) to identity a matrix V^∈Rd×r\widehat{\mathsf{V}} \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times r} with orthonormal columns for which ⟨V^,MV^⟩≥(1−const×gap)∑i=1rλi(M)\langle \widehat{\mathsf{V}}, \mathbf{M} \widehat{\mathsf{V}}\rangle \ge (1 - \mathrm{const} \times \mathtt{gap})\sum_{i=1}^r λ_i(\mathbf{M}). Our bound requires only that dd is a small polynomial in 1/gap1/\mathtt{gap} and rr, and matches the upper bounds of Musco and Musco '15. Moreover, it establishes a strict separation between convex optimization and \emph{randomized}, "strict-saddle" non-convex optimization of which PCA is a canonical example: in the former, first-order methods can have dimension-free iteration complexity, whereas in PCA, the iteration complexity of gradient-based methods must necessarily grow with the dimension.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.