Paper detail

Tight Bounds for Black Hole Search in Dynamic Rings

In this paper, we start the investigation of distributed computing by mobile agents in dangerous dynamic networks. The danger is posed by the presence in the network of a black hole BH, a harmful site that destroys all incoming agents without leaving any trace. The problem of determining the location of the black hole in a network, known as black hole search BHS, has been extensively studied in the literature, but always and only assuming that the network is static. At the same time, the existing results on mobile agents computing in dynamic networks never consider the presence of harmful sites. In this paper we start filling this research gap by studying black hole search in temporal rings, specifically focusing on 1-interval connectivity adversarial dynamics. The problem is solved if within finite time at least one agent survives and knows the location of BH. The main complexity parameters of BHS is the number of agents (called size) needed to solve the problem, and the number of moves (called cost) performed by the agents; in synchronous systems, such as temporal rings, an additional complexity measure is the amount of time until termination occurs. Feasibility and complexity depend on many parameters; in particular: whether the agents start from the same safe node or from possibly distinct safe locations, the size $n$ of the ring, whether or not $n$ is known, and the type of inter-agent communication (whiteboards, tokens, face-to-face, visual). In this paper, we provide a complete feasibility characterization for all instances of those parameters; all our algorithms are size optimal. Furthermore, we establish lower bounds on the cost (i.e., the number of moves) and time of size-optimal solutions for all instances of those parameters and show that our algorithms achieve those bound.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.