Paper detail

Tight Analysis of Asynchronous Rumor Spreading in Dynamic Networks

The asynchronous rumor algorithm spreading propagates a piece of information, the so-called rumor, in a network. Starting with a single informed node, each node is associated with an exponential time clock with rate $1$ and calls a random neighbor in order to possibly exchange the rumor. Spread time is the first time when all nodes of a network are informed with high probability. We consider spread time of the algorithm in any dynamic evolving network, $\mathcal{G}=\{G^{(t)}\}_{t=0}^{\infty}$, which is a sequence of graphs exposed at discrete time step $t=0,1\ldots$. We observe that besides the expansion profile of a dynamic network, the degree distribution of nodes over time effect the spread time. We establish upper bounds for the spread time in terms of graph conductance and diligence. For a given connected simple graph $G=(V,E)$, the diligence of cut set $E(S, \overline{S})$ is defined as $ρ(S)=\min_{\{u,v\}\in E(S,\overline{S})}\max\{\bar{d}/d_u, \bar{d}/d_v\}$ where $d_u$ is the degree of $u$ and $\bar{d}$ is the average degree of nodes in the one side of the cut with smaller volume (i.e., ${\mathtt{vol}}{(S)}=\sum_{u\in S}d_u$). The diligence of $G$ is also defined as $ρ(G)=\min_{ \emptyset\neq S\subset V}ρ(S)$. We show that the spread time of the algorithm in $\mathcal{G}$ is bounded by $T$, where $T$ is the first time that $\sum_{t=0}^TΦ(G^{(t)})\cdotρ(G^{(t)})$ exceeds $C\log n$, where $Φ(G^{(t)})$ denotes the conductance of $G^{(t)}$ and $C$ is a specified constant. We also define the absolute diligence as $\overlineρ(G)=\min_{\{u,v\}\in E}\max\{1/d_u,1/d_v\}$ and establish upper bound $T$ for the spread time in terms of absolute diligence, which is the first time when $\sum_{t=0}^T\lceilΦ(G^{(t)})\rceil\cdot \overlineρ(G^{(t)})\ge 2n$. We present dynamic networks where the given upper bounds are almost tight.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.