Paper detail

TiAu TES 32$\times$32 pixel array: uniformity, thermal crosstalk and performance at different X-ray energies

Large format arrays of transition edge sensor (TES) are crucial for the next generation of X-ray space observatories. Such arrays are required to achieve an energy resolution of $\mathrmΔE<$3 eV full-width-half-maximum (FWHM) in the soft X-ray energy range. We are currently developing X-ray microcalorimeter arrays as a backup option for the X-IFU instrument on board of ATHENA space telescope, led by ESA and foreseen to be launched in 2031. In this contribution, we report on the development and the characterization of a uniform 32$\times$32 pixel array with (length$\times $width) 140$\times$30 $μ$m$^2$ TiAu TESs, which have \textcolor{black}{a 2.3 $μ$m} thick Au absorber for X-ray photons. The pixels have a typical normal resistance $R_\mathrm{n}$ = 121 m$Ω$ and a critical temperature $T_\mathrm{c}\sim$ 90 mK. We performed extensive measurements on 60 pixels out of the array in order to show the uniformity of the array. We obtained an energy resolutions between 2.4 and 2.6 eV (FWHM) at 5.9 keV, measured in a single-pixel mode at AC bias frequencies ranging from 1 to 5 MHz, with a frequency domain multiplexing (FDM) readout system, which is developed at SRON/VTT. We also present the detector energy resolution at X-ray with different photon energies generated by a modulated external X-ray source from 1.45 keV up to 8.9 keV. Multiplexing readout across several pixels has also been performed to evaluate the impact of the thermal crosstalk to the instrument&#39;s energy resolution budget requirement. This value results in a derived requirement, for the first neighbour, that is less than 1$\times$10$^{-3}$ when considering the ratio between the amplitude of the crosstalk signal to an X-ray pulse (for example at 5.9 keV)

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.