Paper detail

Three dimensional simulations of embolic stroke: clinical comparisons and an equation for sizing emboli from imaging

There is a need to develop Monte Carlo simulations of stroke to run in-silico trials to replace animal models, explore clinical scenarios to develop hypotheses for clinical studies and for interpreting clinical monitoring. We perform three-dimensional (3D) stroke simulations, carrying out in-silico trials to relate lesion volume to embolus diameter and calculate probabilistic lesion overlap maps, building on our previous Monte Carlo method. Simulated emboli were released into a 3D in silico vasculature, supplying gray and white matter brain volumes, to generate individual lesion estimates and probabilistic lesion overlap maps. Computer generated lesions were assessed by clinicians and compared with real world radiological images. Simulations of large single emboli reproduced similar middle cerebral artery (MCA), posterior cerebral artery (PCA) and anterior cerebral artery (ACA) lesions to those observed clinically. A proof-of-concept in-silico trial led to a conjecture relating estimated infarct volume as a percentage of total brain volume to relative embolus diameter: $\mathrm{relative diameter} = [\% \mathrm{infarct volume} / a]^{1/b}$, where $a= 104.2 \pm 0.98$, $b=3.380 \pm 0.030$. Probabilistic lesion overlap maps were created, confirming the MCA territory as the most probable resting place of emboli in the computational vasculature, followed by the PCA then ACA. The article shows proof of concept for developing a 3D stroke model from an automatically constructed vasculature.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.